Search

‘SnOasis is not a fantasy’ – Final details being lodged for £400m snow sports centre as new photos revealed

PUBLISHED: 13:31 29 August 2017 | UPDATED: 08:13 30 August 2017

New-look artist impression of SnOasis. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS

New-look artist impression of SnOasis. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS

Archant

The developer behind the controversial SnOasis development has insisted his dream of opening the £400m winter sports resort in Great Blakenham is not a “fantasy”, as new photographs of the proposed SnOasis are released.

New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed speed skating. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed speed skating. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS

Final details for the application are still being lodged to Mid Suffolk District Council (MSDC) planning officers, who have requested further information, a MSDC spokesman has confirmed.

The controversial SnOasis scheme has been dogged by setbacks and delays since Onslow Suffolk first acquired the former quarry site in 2001, with the aim of creating a £300m complex with an indoor ski slope, ice rink, hotels as well as shops and apartments.

Developer Godfrey Spanner, of Onslow Suffolk, has blamed the delays on the recession, planning technicalities and ecological matters such as newts and crayfish at the site.

Outline planning consent was granted in 2008 by the government after a public inquiry, and renewed in 2011.

New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed lake view. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed lake view. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS

Last October, Onslow Suffolk submitted the Reserved Matters Application for the proposed year-round winter sports family leisure resort in order to safeguard outline planning consent. It was verified by planning officers at Mid Suffolk District Council in November.

• Last November, campaigners called on Mr Spanner to give up his “fantasy” dream.

New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed ski slope. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed ski slope. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS

Today, asked if SnOasis will become a reality, developer Godfrey Spanner said: “Absolutely – I have no doubt in my mind whatsoever. I have waited 16 years for this position and I’m still here and I shall be here until it is finished. But this should have all been done and dusted a long time ago.

“I’m not ever going to give up. If I was going to give up, I would have done so several years ago. I’m here just to see this completed.

“Having spent most minutes of my life since 2001 in getting to this target, there is no way that I’m not going to achieve it.”

In response to claims that his plans are a “fantasy”, he said: “They have been saying that for 15 years and my answer is the same: I don’t think it is a fantasy. There are theme parks and developments going on all over the world.

New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed approach to SnOasis. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed approach to SnOasis. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS

“In today’s money, £400m is not a huge sum, and there is a desperate requirement for it. Our winter sports athletes have no facilities in this country at all.

“The majority of local people have always supported as and I think most of them still so – but the same old names pop up who don’t want to see it.”

The price tag for SnOasis has now risen from £300m to £400m. The completion date has also been set back again to 2021. Over the previous 15 years, other dates of 2007, 2014, 2016, and 2020 have been given.

Mr Spanner said international investors form part of the financial backing, which he insists is in place.

New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed village centre. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS New-look artist impression of SnOasis. The proposed village centre. Picture: ONSLOW SUFFOLK/SNOASIS

He added: “There are several offers of finance but we can’t finalise those until we have definitive planning consent. We have had a great deal of time to go knocking on doors and we have had a great deal of interest of people joining us.

“Our final proposals – we have been updating since last October, and various bodies have come back with queries and comments. As those have come in, we have gone back and hopefully satisfied each of them. It has been quite a long process.

“We are waiting for at this minute to hear from the local authority – their proposals to draft conditions to be added to any permission that may give.

“We were hoping to get to a (planning) committee this week or next week, but that’s not going to happen. We are still really pressing them to get everything sorted so that we will get the decision hearing in September.

“We do have (planning) consent. It was renewed in 2011. It is just detailed design that is being considered at the moment.”

Dan Poulter, MP for Central Suffolk and North Ipswich, said the project does not appear to have a strong enough business model to attract investment.

He said: “I’ve always been very sceptical about SnOasis. I’ve never felt that Great Blakenham is the right place for such a project and if there was a strong economic case for it, then it would have happened by now.

“It doesn’t appear to have a strong enough case to attract investment ­- even in the last five years which has seen a strong economy in East Anglia.

“That area is an area which does have a need for community facilities but in my opinion, the land should be put to better use.

“The reality is that despite five years of a strong economy in East Anglia, he [Godfrey Spanner] has not been able to deliver this project.

“I’ve have always felt that the idea of a snow dome in the middle of the Suffolk countryside is flawed.”

Andrew Stringer, leader of the Green party at Mid Suffolk District Council, said: “I think if there were the hundreds of financial backers that is being claimed, then it would have happened by now.

“I know there has been an economic downturn but the world has moved on since outline planning permission was first granted.

“There are far more sustainable tourism enterprises which have gone ahead and are doing very well.”

A spokeswoman for Mid Suffolk District Council said: “Following public consultation on additional information which has been submitted, Mid Suffolk is continuing to work with the developer and consultees to resolve matters which have arisen through this process.

“We currently have an extension of time until August 31, 2017, and it’s likely a further extension for the determination of this application will need to be discussed with the developer.”

0 comments

Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files
Comments

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Stowmarket Mercury visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Stowmarket Mercury staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Stowmarket Mercury account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

Other popular content

15:00

Test your knowledge on our county by taking part in our quiz.

Snow is falling across Suffolk and Essex today, but weather experts predict it will soon turn into rain.

24 minutes ago

A charity chief executive has spoken of ambitions to support the overburdened NHS in the future by extending its offer for young people.

13:53

Police are growing “increasingly concerned” for the welfare of a missing 52-year-old Suffolk man.

Local weather

Snow

Snow

max temp: 3°C

min temp: 3°C

Show Job Lists

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter
MyDate24 MyPhotos24